This is a brief excerpt from the document you requested from IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Database.

Case Summary

Wildenstein & Co., Inc. v. Wallis

Wildenstein & Co. v. Wallis, 756 F. Supp. 158 (S.D.N.Y. 1991), question certified, 949 F.2d 632 (2d Cir. 1991), certified question answered, 595 N.E.2d 828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992), rev’d without opinion, 983 F.2d 1047 (2d Cir. 1992).
See also: Wildenstein & Co. v. Wallis, No. 89-CV-3187 (S.D.N.Y. June 29, 1994) (stipulation and order of dismissal on remand). 

Précis
The wife of the California collector Hal B. Wallis arranged, unbeknownst to him, to use a painting by Claude Monet and another by Paul Gauguin as collateral for a loan. Through intermediaries, the Wildenstein Gallery in New York acquired the paintings in 1981. Wallis negotiated their return in exchange for monetary compensation and granting the gallery preemptive rights . . . .






Click here to subscribe to IFAR's Art Law & Cultural Property Database to access this and other documents about U.S. and international legislation and case law concerning the acquisition, authenticity, export, ownership, and copyright of art objects.