This is a brief excerpt from the document you requested from IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Database.

Case Summary

United States v. Schultz

United States v. Schultz, 178 F.Supp 2d 445 (S.D.N.Y. 2002), aff’d, 333 F.3d (2d Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1106 (2004).

See also: Schultz v. United States, 05 Civ. 246 (JSR), 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12836 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (denying post-conviction relief).

At issue in this case was the validity of enforcing foreignpatrimony laws in United States courts under the National Stolen Property Act.  Frederick Schultz, a New York antiquities dealer, was accused of conspiracy to deal in antiquities alleged to have been stolen in violation of Egyptian law.  In 1983 Egypt enacted Law 117 under which all antiquities became the property of the State and trade in antiquities was prohibited and punishable by a prison term and a fine. Under the United States National Stolen Property Act . . . .

Click here to subscribe to IFAR's Art Law & Cultural Property Database to access this and other documents about U.S. and international legislation and case law concerning the acquisition, authenticity, export, ownership, and copyright of art objects.