This is a brief excerpt from the document you requested from IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Database.
Case Summary
Tony Shafrazi Gallery, Inc. v. Christie's Inc.
Tony Shafrazi Gallery, Inc. v. Christies Inc., No. 112192/2007, 2008 NY Slip Op 33092 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008); on reconsideration, 2009 NY Slip Op 31088 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009); summary judgment granted, 2011 NY Slip Op 33059 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011).
Précis
A New York state trial court held that a downstream purchaser of a fake painting could pursue a
fraud
The intentional use of deceit, a trick or some dishonest means to deprive another of his money, property or legal right, either as a cause of action or as a fatal element in the action itself.
fraud claim against Christie’s, which had initially sold the work to a gallery (from which the plaintiff made his purchase) as authentic and misattributed it in the accompanying auction catalogue. Notwithstanding that Christie’s (1) was unaware of the existence of the downstream purchaser, and (2) asserted that . . . .
Associated Legal Decision(s)
Associated Statutes and/or Legislation
Click here to subscribe to IFAR's Art Law & Cultural Property Database to access this and other documents about U.S. and international legislation and case law concerning the acquisition, authenticity, export, ownership, and copyright of art objects.
