IFAR - International Foundation for Art Research

This is a brief excerpt from the document you requested from IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Database.

Case Summary

Educational Resources > Art Law and Cultural Property > Case Law and Statutes > Art Fraud, Attribution, Authenticity, Forgery, Libel, Defamatory Statements > Case Summary

Knispel v. Gallery 63 Antiques

Knispel v. Gallery 63 Antiques, et. al., No. BER-L-20743-14 (N.J. Super. Ct. 2015).

Print this Page

Case Summary

Case Details / Image

Précis

The Knispels unsuccessfully sued their New York dealer and authenticator in New Jersey Superior Court when, twenty years after purchasing a painting said to be by Norman Rockwell (1984-1978), was discovered to be by a lesser-known artist and worth ...

Associated Legal Decision(s)

Knispel v. Gallery 63 Antiques, et. al., No. BER-L-20743-14 (N.J. Super. Ct. 2015).

Click here to subscribe to IFAR's Art Law & Cultural Property Database to access this and other documents about U.S. and international legislation and case law concerning the acquisition, authenticity, export, ownership, and copyright of art objects.